Like lots of folks in america, I’ve employment. I perform, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the us government distributes my taxes while they see fit. In order to get that pay, I’m required to move a urine test, which I have no issue with. I’ve nothing to cover and the key reason I’ve no issue with a drug test is. What I actually do have a problem with may be the distribution of my taxes to people that are never and doing drugs have to move a urine test. Because I’ve to pass one to earn it for them, shouldn’t one have to pass a urine test to acquire a welfare check? Please comprehend, I have not a problem with helping people reunite on the feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with supporting somebody sit on their bottom. Can you imagine the amount of money their state could save if people had to go a urine test to acquire a public assistance check? A 1999 Michigan law required a pilot program of arbitrary drug abuse screening in at the least three counties. Drug assessment started at the start of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a designated part of Western Wayne County, including some of Detroit’s west side neighborhoods. All the new people for that place had to supply a urine test to officers or stop trying their right to any government assistance. Additionally, any candidates already in the machine had to submit to random testing. A class action lawsuit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days ahead of routine testing. The suit charges that this program violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. Two Michigan parents and a Detroit company (The Westside Mothers) were called in the suit. The corporation targets representing countless welfare recipients and their loved ones. If you are concerned with the world, you will likely choose to compare about cyprus bank lawyer investigation. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan states, \The Fourth Amendment guarantees that number person in this country can be subjected to a search by the government unless there’s reasonable suspicion that they have committed some crime, welfare recipients may be bad, but that’s not a not yet, anyway.\ I have talked to several people personally and on forums about their views and the ones that oppose this have the same position, that it’s unconstitutional. For me, it would appear that I am perhaps not pushing random drug test onto any random citizen. The welfare recipient chooses to get help from the government. Therefore the same as publishing paperwork, you must send a urine test. Still another posture people discuss is false positives. Then do a hair follicle test, well should they maintain false good. If urine check are unconstitutional, then scrap the entire welfare system. Allow your voice be heard on Political Majority.com.