Help and advice

Hello ladies<
I’am looking for advice and help, i have been to two other private clinics and been given massivly conflicting advice?!
I have had four children and breast fed so have little to no nautral breast tissue left im a 34a and was a 34d.
one surgeon said to have 475cc under but the other said 500cc over?!
my consultaion date is in 2weeks but just wonder if anyone else has had conflicting advie?!
ideally id like as large and natural looking as possible?!
very confused?!

Hey huni these sizes are not much diffrent to each other so u 475 cc v 500c to make it easy to unders. Stand 475cc = 475g or mls so you 500cc is just one tiny aumont of 25g or 25ml they will both take you to the same size cup size xx

There are ruffly 150cc to one cup size so u will go up 3 cup size from a to a D cup or a little over to DD xx

ah ok thank you, was more the difference between one saying over and the other under x

cant wait to have consultation get the ball rolling, just trying to sort finance now an being a nightmare x

Bless you. I went to a few and got given a different size every different clinic I went too. I researched online and the best advice was to go with the surgeon not the implant. I went eith the surgeon who put me off the most and was thorough. I know It sounds ridiculous but because I had a bony chest. Part of my ribcage was higher than another and I was super scared to go too big. I’m first day today and sore but they look pretty even. Please feel free to add me. I think considering Youve had babies. Up to you. If you have loose skin go with overs to fill it out but if they are small and perky unders to keep them more natural looking. Unders can cause problems in future as if your boobs sag your implants won’t. Whovk could look odd. Google double bubble. I researched got months. But I feel confident in my decision. Good luck angel. And if you are having trouble with finance then go with the bank or no interest credit Card. It’s so much cheaper in the long run. Xxxx

Hey huni 2 diffence looks with over the muscle they look well rounded and u get more of the fake look with a cleavage. Full unders sit high up and look abit natrel but you don’t get the fake look or a cleavage and look more smaller than they look as the muscle is pinning them down more Ive just from unders to over feel free to add me so u can see the diffrence for yours wot look are u wanting ?

With unders they are less likely to sag over time with natural age that’s y they put them under as it acts like a sports bra that’s holds them n place And come with not very much risk Overs are at risk of sagging CC bottoming out and lots of other things x

The double bubble deformity after breast implants is almost always a technical error. Your surgeon has to plan the right operation for your anatomy, and then create exactly the correct implant pockets.

This over the muscle).implant placement over the muscle in the sub-glandular position, completely in contact with the breast tissue. The result of implants over the muscle provides a round augmented look in many patients, but many women prefer the round and somewhat less natural look. In the “over” approach the implants are inside the breast. Advantages are ease of the surgery, which can be accomplished by almost any surgeon, avoidance of mastopexy in mild ptosis (although it usually makes the ptosis worse later), less post-op discomfort, since only skin and fat are cut. This approach allows insertion of oversize implants, which is again what some women want. Disadvantages are marked interference with mammograms (about 40% obstruction – see reference below), clear visibility and feel of implant edges, visible and palpable rippling of the skin over the implants, especially with any textured implants, higher rate of capsule contracture, high rate of later implant downward migration or “bottoming-out”, and difficulty correcting later posts problems when they occur. For the above reasons I seldom recommend implants over the muscle anymore.

(Fully under the muscle ) Complete implant muscle coverage is with intact muscle fascia supporting the lower pole of the implant. This support fascia is the extension of the muscle envelope from the pectoralis muscles to the abdominal rectus muscles, and the finger shaped serratus anterior muscles to the sides, and is a stout collagen sheet which stretches slowly after implant placement, but provides reliable long-term internal bra-like support to prevent “bottoming-out”. With this approach the implants are totally behind the breast. Complete muscle coverage of the implant, without cutting through the muscles, can only be achieved by trans-axillary approach, entering the space under the muscle where it lies closest to the skin in the anterior axillary fold. The Advantages of this approach are ease of placement, natural breast shape no implant visibility, no rippling of the implant surface (except textured implants in thin women), lower capsule contracture risk, since the breasts are completely separated from the implant, and no ducts with germs are damaged while placing the implants, low mammography interference, good internal support, and no scars on the breast. Disadvantages are the difficulty mastering the procedure, thus it is not available from all surgeons, muscle discomfort post-op, and implants which tend early to be a bit full superiorly, until the support fascia stretches. This is my preferred technique for the majority of patients.

wow thank you reading this has been very helpful xx

Awww your very welcome chick its so hard and confusing on the whole of the breast implants it’s me 4 years to know wot I know with a full uplifts 2 revision surgerys and other thing on top lol if u need anything you know waere Iam xx

[Author]

Posts