Do overs actually sag quicker than unders or is this myth

?

my surgeon said it doesn’t matter. The muscle doesn’t give that much support either.

It all depends on the individual and what there skin is like

Yeah I was offered both so i really cant decide, im only a 32b though x

Generally unders dont sag as quick as overs the muscle is more support than just breast tissue. My surgeon said i could have had either but he said unders would be a better option than overs as the result in the lobg run would be better. However its also down to the individual how long unders/overs sag. My unders have dropped too low but thats because the pocket thats been made is too big xx

Who size did you have hun? x

I had 380cc im 4mnth po and having a reop in the next 3 months due to the problems. Javing them replaced with 460cc xxx

My surgeon said the largest he did in unders was 410 cc, and if i had overs i could have 460 or even 525, just want to look a D/DD xxx

My surgeon said that in women the muscle is so thin it provides very little support and will not slow down sag any more than overs. I was told the only reason they starting doing unders was when silicone was banned in the US and they saline implants which were prone to rippling so they hid them behind the muscle and the unders technique was born!

i had 525 overs and i measure 34f but look like a d/dd xx

i had 525 overs form a c and measure 34g but look a d dd too xx

Its all weird hun lol my surgeon said to me if i had overs i would have to have smaller than 380cc they all say such different things n wen i said to him that id read most ppl could have larger ones with overs than they could with unders he said oh no no. xx

Its all weird hun lol my surgeon said to me if i had overs i would have to have smaller than 380cc they all say such different things n wen i said to him that id read most ppl could have larger ones with overs than they could with unders he said oh no no. xx

[Author]

Posts