Maybe a silly question, but I am a newbie so please be gentle!

I have been an active reader of the forum and I have come across several times the expression under and over. From what I understand it is under the muscle and over the muscle. But in practical terms, what difference does it make? I gather that one has a longer recovery than the other. But apart from that, what are the advantages and disadvantages?

As in the title, please be gentle…

I had overs due to the skin I already had (I was a B cup), I think a lot is decided on this and what look you want. Ive had a great recovery and according to a friend overs are easier to recover from so this makes sense in some ways……Ive read that people have said you can feel them more or they feel/lool more fake but I wouldnt agree with this at all, mine feel very natural and look great, they feel nice and full which is what I wanted.

No question is a silly question hun………….your surgeon will decide if you have enough breast tissue as to whether he gives u unders or overs. Unders means under the muscle helping to hide the implant and giving you a more natural look xx

This might help:

http://dr-dowden.com/faqs/implpect.html

Thank you all for the answering my question!

Going for my first consultation tonight and I cant wait! I am a 36AA and very different sized!

Good luck Huni the journey starts here hehe and gets more and more exciting x

Hi babe, I was offered unders and overs!!

I’m a small C cup but I went for unders because:

– less chance of capsular contracture

– less chance of rippling

– more natural look

– with age the results last longer – don’t drop as much as overs because the muscle is supporting them as well as breast tissue.

It’s a longer recovery time but I was worried about the risks so felt more piece of mind going with unders.

Hope this helps hun!!

xx

[Author]

Posts