Surgeon Consultation Pics

Hi girls,

I am 34B and wanting to achieve a DD. I am 5ft 7 about 10 stone and I have my final surgeon consultation Monday and I decide on my implant size.

I have been offered 425 450 and 495.

Any girls had the same stats an same implants as me? I want to see as many pictures as possible to decide what look i want.

Thanks xxx

Same stats as me hun and in having 500 cc on Friday to have DD/E

Hey huni every girl is so different and everyone’s outs are different the golden rule on hear is to aways go or biggest implants as all these sizes you have been given are not that much different In size so your 425cc v 450 cc is only 25grams bigger and that’s such a small amount 450 v 495cc is 25grams different even thou the numbers look big you need think outside the box as there is 150cc per cup size and the implants looks so big out side the skin they will look so much smaller under your skin they say 200cc to 450cc are classed as small implants hope this helps chick cx

Hey lulu 500cc is. Very good size chick I’ve had 415cc /385cc and uplift 2nd op 450cc then two weeks ago I’ve had 590cc and one nipple lift I’m over the moon with them xx

Thanks girls didn’t realise it’s 150cc to a size. Ill deffo go for biggest offered xxx

Oh huni not a lot girls do chick I’ve had my head in this 4 years and 3ops down the line but the 1st op I didn’t know my sizes then I kick back bigger implants and from that day on o so regretted it along with loads of girls on hear but to be fair from 450cc to 650cc is nice good solid size and it’s so important to know your size and get right the 1st time around all us post ops girls will tell you to go for the biggestxx

Thank you hun very helpful but i worry if i go to big of complications and espesh stretch marks!!!!

Hi alex thanks for the heads up. My PC made me feel terrible the other day and said 500cc is “HUGE” (her words) and that i might regret going that size. Although its only 50cc different to what i orignally was gona go for. But im paying all this money for big boobs, so im gona go big! xxx

Thing is. Huni anything. Can happen but only worry if it comes to it it’s going to small you should worry about I don’t think I’ve ever seen on 4 years on hear girls being up set by being to big lol are u having unders partials or overs ? Xx

Overs hunni.. i have heard overs are quicker to recover drop an less chance of issues ? Xxx

Over are more high risk of stuff but the look with overs is a lovely round shape with a cleavage but I had a bad time with fully under my muscle and didn’t get the look I wAnted so due to hCapsular Contracture and had to have my 2nd re op with 590cc motiva over the muscle with one nipple lift but there is pro n cons with all placements of implants

(Info on overs ). The photos at left show implant placement over the muscle in the sub-glandular position, completely in contact with the breast tissue. The result of implants over the muscle provides a round augmented look in many patients, but many women prefer the round and somewhat less natural look. In the “over” approach the implants are inside the breast. Advantages are ease of the surgery, which can be accomplished by almost any surgeon, avoidance of mastopexy in mild ptosis (although it usually makes the ptosis worse later), less post-op discomfort, since only skin and fat are cut. This approach allows insertion of oversize implants, which is again what some women want. Disadvantages are marked interference with mammograms (about 40% obstruction – see reference below), clear visibility and feel of implant edges, visible and palpable rippling of the skin over the implants, especially with any textured implants, higher rate of capsule contracture, high rate of later implant downward migration or “bottoming-out”, and difficulty correcting later posts problems when they occur. For the above reasons I seldom recommend implants over the muscle anymore.

(Info on partials). partial submuscular implant coverage with implants placed under the muscle via either an areola (nipple) incision or an inframammary crease incision, thus disrupting the muscle support fascia at the lower pole of the implant to allow it to enter the space under the muscle. With this approach the implants are mostly behind the breast. This approach has the Advantages of mostly separating the implants from the muscle, facilitating unobstructed mammography, a more natural look with a soft transition from the flat of the upper chest wall to the round shape of the implant, much less visibility and feel of the implant edges, usually no rippling (except textured implants), and low risk of capsule contracture, as long as the implants have not been contaminated by ductal germs while being passed through the breast tissues. Disadvantages include a bit more discomfort early post-op, technique a bit more difficult than over the muscle, and the loss of the lower pole support fascia which leave the implants supported by the same weak skin tissues as implants over the muscle, leading to later downward bottoming-out of the implants in a few patients as is frequently seen in implants over the muscle.

Full under. Complete implant muscle coverage is shown at left with intact muscle fascia supporting the lower pole of the implant. This support fascia is the extension of the muscle envelope from the pectoralis muscles to the abdominal rectus muscles, and the finger shaped serratus anterior muscles to the sides, and is a stout collagen sheet which stretches slowly after implant placement, but provides reliable long-term internal bra-like support to prevent “bottoming-out”. With this approach the implants are totally behind the breast. Complete muscle coverage of the implant, without cutting through the muscles, can only be achieved by trans-axillary approach, entering the space under the muscle where it lies closest to the skin in the anterior axillary fold. The Advantages of this approach are ease of placement, natural breast shape no implant visibility, no rippling of the implant surface (except textured implants in thin women), lower capsule contracture risk, since the breasts are completely separated from the implant, and no ducts with germs are damaged while placing the implants, low mammography interference, good internal support, and no scars on the breast. Disadvantages are the difficulty mastering the procedure, thus it is not available from all surgeons, muscle discomfort post-op, and implants which tend early to be a bit full superiorly, until the support fascia stretches. This is my preferred technique for the majority of patients.

Thanks baby really needed that. At end of the day we can’t choose have to trust tte surgeon im nervous going over now i don’t think i have much fat tissue i don’t want the fake look seeing implant edges. I have slightly tubular breasts maybe that’s why xxx so confusing

Awwwww chick you will be fine every girl. Is different and my unders wear. Crap for me and I love. My love mine being over x

What’s the benefits being over im panicking now lol xxx

You get nice cleavage and a nicer shape x

[Author]

Posts