unders / overs .. low / high profile?? PLEASE HELP? op in 21 days! Started by: rachf

  • Author
    Posts
  • rachf
    0p
    Menu

    Hi all..

    I am 5’8″ size 10 getting 300 or 340 unders but still so unsure of everything

    can anyone BLUNTLY / CLEARLY explain the differences between overs/unders low and high and look.

    My surgeon Mr Azurazi only said after what I said I wanted (natuaral looking) said you should go for 300 with lower incision???? I am still totally unsure that I am making the right choice and with only 21days to go I want to make the right decision.. ANY advice wil be a help

    rach x

    alilou
    0p
    Menu

    Hey hun,

    What size are you now? I was a 34 A,5ft 4inch and a size 8-10, I had 525cc high profile overs 2 weeks ago and I’m waring a 36 E sports bra. I think it all depends on what size you’d like to be. I wanted natural looking also.

    OK i’ll try to explain the overs unders – from what I’ve read you can only have over the muscle if you have enough breast tissue otherwise the implant would show, the recovery time is also suppose to be much easier than unders. When having under the muscle I believe some of the implant size is lost, but it is necessary to cover the implant.

    High and Low profile are the position there placed in either higher or lower for a more teardrop shape….I think…lol.

    Your welcome to see my pics if you like? Just send your email address xx

    rachf
    0p
    Menu

    thanks alilou ,

    there is so much to learn I think I should go with what surgeon said but there is always a certain doubt that you always know whats best.. lol

    email is falconer4@talktalk.net

    cheers hunx x

    alilou
    0p
    Menu

    Sent huni x

    rachf
    0p
    Menu

    thanks hunny Just seen this post,

    your boobs look fab, I hope mine look like that

    Rach xx

You must log in to reply to this topic.

Arrange a free consultation

Need some help?

Start a live chat session with one of our expert advisors.

Start Chat

Don't notify me about this again.